Profil de Little Girly Ma...Why Does He Love Bricks?PhotosBlogListesPlus  |  Outils Aide |
|
17 février BBC vs 9/11 Truth MovementIs BBC the British FOX? If so then what the hell is ITV? lol!
Here are the questions on the BBC's website which have answers too long winded to be put on this blog [plus i only put facts on here - hehehe just kidding].
Below are my responses to the BBC website's answers to those questions.
They come from a variety of sources usually on the internet - but in many cases especially relating to the demolitions/building collapses are backed up by my A-levels in maths physics and Chemistry, and the 1st year chemistry i did at university.
Here are the questions:
Could the US Air Force have prevented the attacks?
Were the Twin Towers deliberately demolished by explosives? Was WTC7 deliberately demolished by explosives? Were Jews forewarned about the attacks? Did a commercial airline hit the Pentagon? Can CCTV footage prove what happened at the Pentagon? Did a military transport plane control the attack on the Pentagon? Was United 93 shot down? Did United 93 crash? Could the attacks have been prevented? ________________________________________________________
Could the US Air Force have prevented the attacks?
The standard US air defence proceedure generally has an interceptor jet in the air with any plane that deviates from it's standard course within ten minutes. This is without any form of authority from ANYONE other than the air force officer in charge of scrambling flights at the nearest air force base. The FAA are requied to contact norad if they come across any problem which they cannot resolve within one minute. NORAD then contact the nearest air force base to the jet, and planes are scrambled. This is a standard proceedure.
this will not neccesarily result in a shooting down - THIS can not be done without an executive order.
the planes headed to the sea? nope... similar interceptions had been made on around 100 occasions a year, with a 100% success ratio of 'contact'.
On September 11th, the US military [and other US organisations such as FEMA] were participating in the highest level of military exercises in the country's history.
Elements constituting a significant portion of the US air force were in Alaska, and the No-Fly zone in Iraq, and elsewhere. NORAD were participating in a hijack simulation exercise- and up to 29 commercial jets were reported as hijacked that day.
:Transport secretary Norman Mineta gave witness testimony of a Security Person repeatedly telling Dick Cheney 'the plane is 50 miles out' the plane is 20 miles out' 'the plane is 10 miles out' then asking Cheney 'do the orders still stand?' whereupon Cheney told him 'Did i tell you any different?'
Were the Twin Towers deliberately demolished by explosives?
Yes. There is no question about this - just find a video of it and watch it again.
That is about as much evidence as you will get from ppl who support the pancake theory and others, If you dont believe them first time they will just repeat themselves. possibly louder, and possibly on TV. I have pages and pages worth. However i will keep it concise.
1: OK lets say that the floors DID pancake [which they couldnt have done - they fell too fast to be impacting with one another]. the trusses and floors did not even support the building - that was left to the core of the building. this steel central-core of the building would still be intact.
2: Even if EVERY ONE of the 47 steel columns was heated to 650C all the way along their 1000ft length, [an input of energy so ridiculously large i will have to wait until tomorrow for my calculator to evolve] they would at best have BENT, not collapsed straight downwards into convenient 30ft sections. they would have bent one way or another (and collapsed onto another building), or remained standing and buckled tro some degree or other
although the steel may have lost half of its tensile or compressional strength, it would be LESS likely to break - and the hotter it was the less likely we would be to see clean breaks on sections of these girders- we would see more deformation, and fewer breaks.
3: as mentioned above, if the floors pancaked, the first would have impacted on the next, causing it to lose the momentum that it had gained by falling. This would have happened again as the two floors fell on top of the next. if you drop a billiard ball onto 100 layers of toilet paper, that were even tenuously attached to something, you could compare the speed to a ball dropping at freefall it will be significantly different. lets ignore the fact that what we are really talking about [in the 9/11 comissions report's model] is dropping a sheet of toilet paper onto 100 others and seeing if the third falls, let alone the 85th...
The World trade centre buildings fell at near freefall speeds - ie the material [a whole fucking building for god's sake] encountered virtually NO resistance whatsoever from the 80 undamage floors below the impact.
The world trade centre towers were the first two steel structured buildings ever to collapse due to fire, in the history of the world. see below for the next!
Yep.
See all of the above, and bear in mind that this building was hit by only minor fragments of the world trade centre. a building across the street [ ] was hit by loads of debris and partially collapsed- but only directly where the debris actually hit it.
This building had isolated fires on two floors, and collapsed a few hours later, when you watch footage of this collapse, you can clearly see that the central column of the building collapses FIRST- the building sags in the midddle. this is typical of controlled demolition, and represents the best way to get a building to collapse straight down.
Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the TC at the time was interviewed and said 'ok maybe the best thing is to 'pull' it, and we made that descision to 'pull', and we watched the building collapse'
"pull" is industry slang for demolish -ie pull down.
that's enough for today i will finish this on wednesday after i have done my colege work. CommentairesPour ajouter un commentaire, connectez-vous avec votre identifiant Windows Live ID (si vous utilisez Messenger ou Xbox LIVE, vous avez un identifiant Windows Live ID). Connectez-vous Vous n'avez pas d'identifiant Windows Live ID ? Inscrivez-vous RétroliensL'URL de rétrolien de ce billet est : http://welovebricks.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!135C83B6406C5783!1756.trak Blogs Web qui font référence à ce billet
|
|
|
